For managers responsible for web-site updates, one part of business website renovation keeps them awake at night: the transfer of legacy content from an existing site (or sites) to a newly developed site. Migrating content to a Content Management System (CMS) is a very important part of managing a business’ web presence. It is a difficult, time consuming, meticulous process and requires organizations to allocate significant resources, and train management teams in transfer issues.
Content accumulated over many years creates a maze of structured and unstructured data that can make the migration process potentially disruptive to ongoing operations. The objective of the process is high-performance web migration, which requires first that the parties have a clear vision of what must be accomplished through the migration, and that they then plan the steps necessary to implement the vision.
Careful Assessment and planning is essential for the migration process to succeed, be effective and control costs. It also enables you to understand the complexity of your migration project. Before moving forward with any plan, it’s important to know where you are and where you want to go. Part of planning is ensuring that the right content-migration questions are asked and answered. Both the site owner’s team and the outside technical team should participate in answering the questions and understand each other and the conclusions reached.
Even for middle-size web properties, managing legacy content migration is not a simple task; for very large web sites it is difficult to accomplish, especially when timeframes are short and budgets are tight. A primary part of properly and effectively transferring content from the old site to a new site is carefully inventorying and mapping existing content.
We therefore must use a multi-step approach, which begins with a content inventory and audit:
For the entire process to be feasible, some automation is necessary to keep process costs down and shorten timelines substantially. Inventorying and mapping content are essential to any automation of the process; the content being transferred must be properly identified and logically organized for any automation to succeed. Ideally, with a solid content inventory and audit completed, and established rules to govern the transfer process, decisions can be intelligently made about which parts of the transfer process to automate. It’s wise to automate each step to the extent it can be done feasibly without compromising data or content integrity or quality. While editing can’t be automated, the other steps in the content migration process can be to varying degrees.
Unfortunately, the nature of the transfer process is such that complete automation isn’t possible. Many transfer details must be managed manually to ensure that no content or data is lost, misplaced, overlooked, or otherwise falls through the cracks.
Obviously some content / site migrations are fairly simple and require little sorting or analysis (usually in situations where all content is being moved), but others call for detailed, hands-on supervision of the sorting process. Placement isn’t an issue for migrations between similarly structured sites, but if the new system isn’t structured just like the original site then placement issues require special focus.
The decision on whether, and what parts of the process, to automate depends on several factors, including site size, complexity, content type, accuracy of data, and age. Decisions on what parts can be automated effectively and which must be migrated manually are worthy of close attention during the planning phase. Carefully considering the items that cannot be automated will save the non-technical team a lot of post-migration headache. If a technical team comes in with great automated migration tools, but uses them inappropriately, or makes assumptions, to ram mass content transfer to the new site, it’s very likely that the process will be encumbered with errors. The customer’s team is then left with a big clean up job after transfer than it would have to do some things manually in the first place.
With careful planning, a thorough content inventory, solid communication among all teams and participants, and appropriate levels of automation your content-migration process is far more likely to unfold smoothly, on schedule, and on budget.